⌁ Awesome Auto Research Hub Papers · Datasets · Projects
← Back to papers

OpenDiscoveryTrace: Process Traces for Evaluating AI Scientist Workflows

arXiv 2026 46.7 method

Read-first score

Read-first score 46.7, weighted from topical fit, citation, graph, method, reproducibility, and recency signals.

Recency 8%
100

Uses a gentle age decay so recent papers surface without erasing older foundations. 2026

Methodology quality 25%
70

Screens visible abstract and analysis fields for experiment, dataset, baseline, metric, and limitation evidence. markers=analysis,baseline,benchmark,dataset,evaluation

Reproducibility 25%
46

Screens links and visible text for paper, code, dataset, artifact, and repository signals. pdf=True; code=False; dataset=False; markers=code,dataset

Topical relevance 42%
22.6

Matches configured research keywords against title, abstract, tags, and analysis text. matched=6

Field roles

FrontierMethodology anchor

Rank sensitivity

Stability: volatile; rank range: 84.

Tags