Awesome Auto Research Hub Papers · Datasets · Projects
← Back to papers

Instruct Large Language Models to Generate Scientific Literature Survey Step by Step

arXiv 2024 42.2 method

TLDR

A prompt-based method using LLMs to generate scientific literature surveys step-by-step, achieving low cost and competitive performance.

Reasoning

The paper presents a practical, cost-effective approach for automated survey generation, with strong empirical results from a competition. However, it is narrowly focused on survey writing rather than broader scientific discovery or experimentation, limiting its scope.

Read-first score

Read-first score 42.2, weighted from topical fit, citation, graph, method, reproducibility, and recency signals. Original total remains 46.

Recency 8%
75.1

Uses a gentle age decay so recent papers surface without erasing older foundations. 2024

Methodology quality 25%
50

Screens visible abstract and analysis fields for experiment, dataset, baseline, metric, and limitation evidence. markers=evaluation

Topical relevance 42%
38.3

Uses existing LLM keyword relevance scores normalized to 0-100. AI scientist,automated scientific discovery,autonomous research agent,automated research,literature review agent,survey generation,automated experimentation,experiment design agent,AI for scientific research,paper writing agent,research automation,scientific discovery agent

Reproducibility 25%
30

Screens links and visible text for paper, code, dataset, artifact, and repository signals. pdf=True; code=False; dataset=False; markers=none

Field roles

Candidate

Rank sensitivity

Stability: volatile; rank range: 71.

Keyword Scores

survey generation
10
literature review agent
8
paper writing agent
7
AI for scientific research
6
research automation
6
automated research
5
AI scientist
1
automated scientific discovery
1
autonomous research agent
1
scientific discovery agent
1
automated experimentation
0
experiment design agent
0

Deep Analysis

Innovations

  • Step-by-step prompt design to sequentially generate title, abstract, hierarchical headings, and main content of a literature survey
  • Cost-efficient generation by restricting input and output length in LLM queries
  • High-level heading generation from a top-down perspective

Methodology

The authors design a series of prompts to guide large language models (specifically Qwen-long) to generate scientific literature surveys in a step-by-step manner: first the title, then abstract, then hierarchical headings, and finally the main content. Input and output lengths are restricted to minimize API costs. The approach was evaluated in the NLPCC 2024 Scientific Literature Survey Generation task.

Key Results

The method achieved third place with an overall score only 0.03% lower than second place, a soft heading recall of 95.84% (second best), and a generation cost of 0.1 RMB per survey.

Tags

CL