Beyond Watching and Searching: Benchmarking Agents for Video-centered Deep Research Reports
TLDR
Introduces OmniDR-Bench and Omni-ARTs for benchmarking agents that generate interactive deep research reports centered on source videos, using 50 multilingual real-world tasks.
Reasoning
The paper addresses a novel benchmark gap with a carefully designed evaluation framework and real-world tasks. Its main limitation is that current agents still achieve modest performance, indicating substantial room for improvement.
Read-first score
Read-first score 53, weighted from topical fit, citation, graph, method, reproducibility, and recency signals. Original total remains 35.
Field roles
Rank sensitivity
Stability: volatile; rank range: 139.
Keyword Scores
Deep Analysis
Innovations
- Introduces Video-Centered Deep Research Report Generation, where agents produce interactive reports linked to relevant video moments.
- Presents OmniDR-Bench, a benchmark with 50 Chinese and English tasks across 19 real-world subcategories and 6,414 criteria.
- Proposes Omni Atomic Rubric Trees (Omni-ARTs), with three dimensions, 23 shared directions, and task-specific atomic binary criteria.
- Proposes Audited Rubric Construction (ARC), which builds rubric trees through independent evidence collection, automated checks, behavioral calibration, and iterative human review.
- Describes a skill-based workflow for video-centered deep research agents.
Methodology
The benchmark defines a task in which, given a video and user request, an agent identifies research questions, retrieves external multimodal evidence, and produces an interactive report linked to relevant video moments. Evaluation uses Omni-ARTs rubric trees constructed via ARC, and the benchmark evaluates 18 agent configurations across 50 bilingual tasks in 19 real-world subcategories.
Key Results
Across 18 agent configurations, the best system scores 63.3 out of 100. Current agents still need broader content coverage, stronger causal and logical analysis across modalities, and more accurate citation support.
Limitations
- Current agents still need broader content coverage.
- Stronger causal and logical analysis across modalities is needed.
- More accurate citation support is needed.