Phys-JEPA: Physics-Informed Latent World Models for Multivariate Time-Series Forecasting
TLDR
Phys-JEPA introduces a physics-informed latent world model that decomposes predictive states into physical and residual components for multivariate time-series forecasting.
Reasoning
The paper presents a novel approach by enforcing physical consistency on latent states rather than decoded outputs, showing improvements on real-world datasets. However, the results are described as 'initial', and the evaluation is limited to three datasets without extensive ablation or comparison to state-of-the-art physics-informed methods.
Read-first score
Read-first score 54.9, weighted from topical fit, citation, graph, method, reproducibility, and recency signals. Original total remains 21.
Field roles
Rank sensitivity
Stability: volatile; rank range: 437.
Keyword Scores
Deep Analysis
Innovations
- Decomposition of latent predictive states into physical and residual components
- Imposing physical consistency directly on latent states and latent transitions rather than only on decoded forecasts
- Using known physical variables to organize the representation space while retaining residual capacity for unresolved dynamics
Methodology
Phys-JEPA is a joint-embedding predictive architecture for multivariate time-series forecasting. It learns a latent world model where predictive states are decomposed into physical and residual components, and physical consistency is enforced on latent states and transitions. The model is evaluated on Jena Climate, Traffic, and Electricity datasets using MSE as the metric.
Key Results
On Jena Climate at H=24, aggregate MSE reduces from 0.12482 to 0.12273 and temperature MSE from 0.01892 to 0.01831. On Traffic, full Phys-JEPA improves aggregate MSE over the supervised baseline across all horizons, e.g., H=192 MSE from 0.800784 to 0.773873. On Electricity, the best variant depends on horizon: static latent consistency is strongest at H=24 and H=48, while full Phys-JEPA gives the best aggregate and target-variable MSE at H=192.
Limitations
- Results are preliminary and not yet comprehensive across diverse domains
- Best variant depends on horizon and dataset, requiring careful selection
- Requires known physical variables to define physical components in the latent space