Orbia: Do Generated Videos Form a Consistent 3D World?
TLDR
Orbia is a benchmark for systematically evaluating 3D consistency in interactive world models via controlled exploration, revisits, and metrics across 720 instances.
Reasoning
The paper addresses a clear gap in evaluating 3D consistency of video-based world models, with a structured benchmark and diverse data sources. Its main limitation is that no experimental results or baseline comparisons are visible in the abstract, so the benchmark's utility and findings are not yet demonstrated.
Read-first score
Read-first score 43.3, weighted from topical fit, citation, graph, method, reproducibility, and recency signals. Original total remains 51.
Field roles
Rank sensitivity
Stability: volatile; rank range: 654.
Keyword Scores
Deep Analysis
Innovations
- Introduces Orbia, the first benchmark dedicated to systematic and comprehensive evaluation of 3D consistency in interactive world models.
- Organizes evaluation into three dimensions: input preservation, generated-content persistence, and 3D self-consistency using controlled exploration and revisit.
- Combines public datasets, self-captured scenes, and simulation to yield 720 instances across indoor and outdoor environments with six exploration-and-revisit protocols.
- Evaluates 27 text-, action-, and camera-conditioned models through native-interface adapters.
Methodology
Orbia evaluates video world models through controlled exploration and revisit across three dimensions: input preservation using registered RGB-D references and annotated anchors; generated-content persistence by comparing revisits to regions absent from the input with first generated observations; and 3D self-consistency using cross-view depth and feature correspondence, regional scale agreement, and held-out Gaussian rendering. Minute-long exploration and revisits test long-term consistency across 720 indoor and outdoor instances.
Key Results
The abstract does not report quantitative experimental outcomes; it states that the benchmark provides a systematic basis for diagnosing 3D inconsistency and evaluating 27 models across six protocols.