MoP-JEPA: Hard-Assigned Predictor Mixtures for Stochastic JEPA World Models
TLDR
MoP-JEPA uses hard-assigned predictor mixtures to avoid collapse in stochastic JEPA world models, achieving high planning success on OGBench.
Reasoning
The paper provides strong theoretical proofs and empirical results showing that deterministic predictors fail in stochastic environments, while MoP-JEPA's hard-assigned predictors quantize transitions effectively. However, the evaluation is limited to offline data and the verification protocol adds complexity.
Read-first score
Read-first score 43.9, weighted from topical fit, citation, graph, method, reproducibility, and recency signals. Original total remains 45.
Field roles
Rank sensitivity
Stability: volatile; rank range: 335.
Keyword Scores
Deep Analysis
Innovations
- Hard-assigned predictor mixtures for JEPA world models to handle stochastic transitions
- Proof that deterministic and gated mixture-of-experts predictors collapse to the conditional mean in stochastic environments
- Proof that hard-assigned predictors converge to a quantizer of the transition distribution, with one head per successor mode
- Verification protocol to prevent coverage freeloading in multi-prediction evaluation (input-agnostic codebook control, shuffled-context test, router-gated readouts, transition-precision guards, verified-route criterion)
- Demonstration that planning over predicted modes significantly outperforms single-predictor rollouts and other predictors on OGBench tasks
Methodology
MoP-JEPA extends JEPA world models with a mixture of hard-assigned predictors. The paper theoretically proves the collapse of deterministic and gated MoE predictors in stochastic environments and the convergence of hard-assigned predictors to a quantizer. It evaluates planning success on OGBench offline data with leak-free evaluation, comparing against deterministic, gated-MoE, and variational predictors, and introduces a verification protocol to ensure fair multi-prediction evaluation.
Key Results
Planning over single-predictor rollouts achieves only 0.02-0.09 success, while MoP-JEPA's predicted modes reach up to 0.85, outperforming all baselines on every task. Under the verified-route criterion, MoP-JEPA outperforms the strongest soft alternative by 2-5x on all three mazes, and the same model places second of seven on the hardest maze in real execution.