⌁ Awesome World Model Hub Papers · Datasets · Projects
中文 GitHub
← Back to papers

Current Agents Fail to Leverage World Model as Tool for Foresight

arXiv 26.1 2026 57.2 application

TLDR

Current agents fail to effectively use world models as tools for foresight, rarely simulating and often misusing predictions.

Reasoning

The paper provides empirical evidence across multiple tasks showing agents rarely invoke simulation and performance degrades, with attribution analysis identifying bottlenecks in deciding when and how to simulate. However, it does not propose solutions and focuses only on current limitations.

Read-first score

Read-first score 57.2, weighted from topical fit, citation, graph, method, reproducibility, and recency signals. Original total remains 36.

Recency 8%
100

Uses a gentle age decay so recent papers surface without erasing older foundations. 2026

Methodology quality 25%
80

Screens visible abstract and analysis fields for experiment, dataset, baseline, metric, and limitation evidence. markers=analysis,experiment,result

Topical relevance 42%
51.4

Uses existing LLM keyword relevance scores normalized to 0-100. world model,world simulator,generative world model,interactive world model,video world model,world dynamics prediction,model-based reinforcement learning world model

Reproducibility 25%
30

Screens links and visible text for paper, code, dataset, artifact, and repository signals. pdf=True; code=False; dataset=False; markers=none

Field roles

FrontierMethodology anchor

Rank sensitivity

Stability: volatile; rank range: 387.

Keyword Scores

world model
10
generative world model
8
world simulator
7
world dynamics prediction
4
model-based reinforcement learning world model
3
interactive world model
2
video world model
2

Deep Analysis

Innovations

  • Empirical demonstration that current agents fail to effectively use world models as tools for foresight
  • Identification of specific failure patterns: rare invocation (<1%), misuse of rollouts (~15%), and inconsistent/degraded performance (up to 5%)
  • Attribution analysis revealing bottlenecks in deciding when to simulate, interpreting outcomes, and integrating foresight

Methodology

The paper conducts empirical experiments across diverse agentic and visual question answering tasks. Agents built on vision-language models are provided with generative world models as external simulators. The study measures invocation rates, misuse rates, and performance changes when simulation is available or enforced, and performs attribution analysis to identify bottlenecks.

Key Results

Agents rarely invoke simulation (fewer than 1% of cases), frequently misuse predicted rollouts (approximately 15%), and exhibit inconsistent or degraded performance (up to 5%) when simulation is available or enforced.

Limitations

  • The study does not propose a concrete mechanism to address the identified bottlenecks
  • The empirical results are based on current agent architectures and may not generalize to all future systems

Resources

Paper

Tags